Other Publications
Measuring National Refugee Policies: Recent Trends and Implications for Future Development
AbstractOn December 27, 2022, an article co-written by Masaaki Higashijima, associate professor at Tohoku University, and Yujin Woo, GGR research fellow and assistant professor at the Hitotsubashi University Graduate School of Law, was published in Tohoku University’s Interdisciplinary Information Sciences magazine. In the article, the authors review recent research on national refugee and asylum policies with the goal of introducing recent efforts made by scholars to quantitatively understand different countries’ adoptions of divergent policy tools. To do so, they review and compare extant data sets that quantitatively measure national refugee policies. Through this comparison, they conclude that future research should attempt to understand host countries’ refugee policies through a broader temporal and geographic scope.
Book Review: “The Silent Guns of Two Octobers: Kennedy and Khrushchev Play the Double Game”
AbstractOn December 19, 2022, the Diplomacy and Statecraft journal published a book review written by Professor Toshihiko Aono of the Graduate School of Law at Hitotsubashi University. In this article, the professor reviews the book: “The Silent Guns of Two Octobers: Kennedy and Khrushchev Play the Double Game,” written by Mr. Theodore Voorhees Jr. This book examines the mechanisms that prevented nuclear war during the years 1961 to 1962. Most people regard these years as having been closest to a nuclear war, especially during the period leading up to the Cuban Missile Crisis. However, Mr. Voorhees argues against this stating that the year of 1962 was a “surprisingly safe period” and presents a thorough explanation for his argument. Professor Aono praises this book as having contributed to a further understanding of the Cuban Missile Crisis but states that he has some different views from Mr. Voorhees’ arguments.
Two Years after the Coup: What is Myanmar’s Future? Pointing a Gun on its People, Democratization is Moving Further Away: “Turning the Attention toward the Increasing Number of Refugees” [In Japanese]
AbstractProfessor Maiko Ichihara of Graduate School of Law at Hitotsubashi University, appeared on an article published by Chunichi Simbun on January 30, 2023. Two years after the coup in Myanmar, the conflict between the military and the people still continues. Professor Ichihara addresses this problem and discusses how Japan’s stance towards ASEAN has influenced the situation in Myanmar. She argues that with the ASEAN presidency changing this year, Japan must work together with the ASEAN countries to ensure a more effective approach towards the Myanmar military. In the end, the professor points out that while the Kishida administration has been proactive in accepting refugees from Ukraine, they have not done the same for Myanmar refugees. She stresses that Japan should take action in establishing a more efficient system of accepting refugees from Myanmar in order to maintain consistency in the messages it sends to the international community.
The Prosecutor’s Discretion at the International Criminal Court
AbstractOn December 25, 2022, a new book by Dr. Hitomi Takemura, Professor of the Hitotsubashi University Graduate School of Law, entitled “The Prosecutor’s Discretion at the International Criminal Court” was published. Now that twenty years have passed since the issuing of the Rome Statute which declared the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Professor Takemura discusses the ICC, which yet remains increasingly prominent in the modern world, in terms of prosecutorial discretion. The book first introduces the functions and history of the ICC and then compares Japanese prosecutors with those of the ICC. It also explains the obligation of countries to cooperate with the ICC, the jurisdiction of the ICC, as well as the prosecution strategies of the Prosecutor’s Office.
How to Tackle Disinformation in Japan: Lessons from the Russia-Ukraine War
AbstractIn December 2022, the "Impact of Disinformation on Democracy in Asia" report was published on Brookings, featuring an article by Professor Maiko Ichihara of the Hitotsubashi University Graduate School of Law. First, the professor indicates how extensive Russian disinformation and propaganda about the Russia-Ukraine war have been disrupting the discourse space in Japan. She states that the impact of this disinformation is unprecedented in Japan, making this a useful case study for analyzing the challenges of disinformation and possible appropriate countermeasures. In this context, the paper discusses Japan’s disinformation situation in relation to the Russia-Ukraine war, current countermeasures against disinformation, and recommended policies to overcome the challenges.
60 Years After the Cuban Missile Crisis: What Lessons Can We Learn From It? – The Important Role of “Third Parties” [in Japanese]
AbstractOn October 10, 2022, Chunichi Shimbun published an article entitled “60 Years after the Cuban Missile Crisis: What Lessons can we learn from it? - The Important Role of ‘Third Parties,’” written by Dr. Toshihiko Aono, GGR researcher and professor of the Hitotsubashi University Graduate School of Law. In his article, Professor Aono points out that third parties played important roles in the Cuban Missile Crisis and argues that they can play an important role in the current conflicts between major powers as well. First, the professor reviews in detail the events leading up to the Cuban crisis, noting that the crisis was aggravated by the fact that the outcomes had been different from what both the U.S. and the Soviet Union had planned. In such conflicts where two major powers clash, it has been thought that third countries have no power to influence how the crisis unfolds, but the professor argues that “this is not the case.” In fact, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United Kingdom and the United Nations worked hard to prevent a military conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. In light of this, the professor emphasizes that citizens of third countries may also play an important role in recent major power conflicts.
Lookback 2002 [in Japanese]
AbstractOn December 8, 2022, the January 2023 issue of SEKAI, a magazine published by Iwanami Shoten, printed an article by Professor Yongseok Kwon, GGR researcher and associate professor at Hitotsubashi University’s Graduate School of Law. Reflecting on the current unstable relations between Japan, South Korea, North Korea, and the United States, the professor states that, as the title suggests, he would like to turn back the clock to the year 2002. As reasons for this, he cited the growing mood of friendship between Japan and South Korea since the beginning of the 21st century and the joint hosting of the World Cup. He further argued that the Japan-North Korea Pyongyang Declaration signed in 2002 had the potential to stabilize relations between the two countries. The professor called this paradigm of interlocking Japan-South Korea, North-South, Japan-North Korea, and East Asia the "Illusory 2002 Regime," and discussed that in order to "reconnect" to this regime, we must look back at the events of 2002 and rely on civil solidarity.
Now Trending: Technocracy Will Generation X’s preference for technocratic governance create an opening for future authoritarianism?
AbstractOn December 2, 2022, GGR Assistant Sascha Hannig Nuñez’s article was published in American Purpose, a magazine aimed at promoting and defending liberal democracy. In this article, Ms. Hannig Nuñez identifies a trend among younger generations for preferring technocracy over elected politicians and warns that such phenomenon could justify illiberal or authoritarian governments and undermine the importance of elected officials. She indicates how fake news and disinformation contribute to this rejection of politicians in a democracy and how the recent pandemic has propelled this trend even further. In order to prevent the erosion of democracy, Ms. Hannig Nuñez argues that support for technocrats should be acknowledged and channeled within democracies instead of being perceived as a potential threat and completely dismissed.
60 Years After the Cuban Missile Crisis: What Lessons Can We Learn From It? – The Important Role of “Third Parties” [in Japanese]
AbstractOn October 10, 2022, Chunichi Shimbun published an article entitled “60 Years after the Cuban Missile Crisis: What Lessons can we learn from it? - The Important Role of ‘Third Parties,’” written by Dr. Toshihiko Aono, GGR researcher and professor of the Hitotsubashi University Graduate School of Law. In his article, Professor Aono points out that third parties played important roles in the Cuban Missile Crisis and argues that they can play an important role in the current conflicts between major powers as well. First, the professor reviews in detail the events leading up to the Cuban crisis, noting that the crisis was aggravated by the fact that the outcomes had been different from what both the U.S. and the Soviet Union had planned. In such conflicts where two major powers clash, it has been thought that third countries have no power to influence how the crisis unfolds, but the professor argues that “this is not the case.” In fact, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United Kingdom and the United Nations worked hard to prevent a military conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. In light of this, the professor emphasizes that citizens of third countries may also play an important role in recent major power conflicts.
The Challenge of “Chinese Democracy” (2) [in Japanese]
AbstractIn November 2022, an article by Dr. Makoto Tajimi, professor of Hitotsubashi University′s Graduate School of Law and researcher of GGR, was published in the latest version of the Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and International Studies. The article examines in detail the contents of the white paper “Democracy in the United States” issued by China′s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The purpose of the article is not to analyze the “democratic situation” of the United States itself, but to clarify China′s (namely the Ministry of Foreign Affairs′) theory of “democracy” through an examination of the content and aspects of the Foreign Ministry′s criticism of “American-style democracy.” Through this discussion, Professor Tajimi aims to gain insight into the picture and positioning of “Chinese-style democracy,” which has been presented as a new “universal” alternative to “American-style democracy,” and to forecast the future of the world that lies ahead.